5 Comments
User's avatar
Corioborius's avatar

Why would corporations open up their records to public scrutiny (even academic) given the potential legal risks?

Silvia Tais Herrera's avatar

I think they usually selectevely disclose because the strategic, political, financial, legal, or symbolic benefits outweigh the risks. Building identities is valuable.

Corioborius's avatar

Thank you.

Silvia Tais Herrera's avatar

You're very welcome! I am just learning, too :)

Stephanie Decker FAcSS FBAM's avatar

Hi Corioborius. Silvia is right though there is a lot of variation. In Europe a lot of business archives allow verified researchers and depending on the company there can be very few restrictions (there are exceptions). They disclose to demonstrate that they don’t have skeletons in the closet. Many do their own research. But they are more sceptical towards journalists. In the US it’s more mixed. Coca-Cola for examples lets hardly anyone in. Other companies have donated archives to public libraries and archives (Kaisers for example). In Germany chambers of commerce store and make available archives of regional SMEs. Some UK archives like Unilever even collaborate to run archival hackathons.